Contact

Reaching the right resource matters, especially mid-draft when a question about PPR vs. standard scoring or a last-minute injury impact call can shift an entire strategy. This page covers the contact options available through Fantasy Rankings Authority, the geographic scope of the service, and how to structure a message that gets a useful response without unnecessary back-and-forth.

Additional contact options

The primary channel for detailed ranking inquiries is the site's message form, but two supplementary paths exist for different types of questions.

For straightforward glossary or methodology questions — the kind answered by a quick definition — the Fantasy Rankings Glossary and Rankings Methodology pages resolve most of them without any wait. Those pages are updated on a rolling basis and cover scoring system variables, tier construction logic, and the distinction between consensus aggregation and proprietary projection models.

For data discrepancies — situations where a verified Average Draft Position conflicts with what a platform like Sleeper or ESPN is showing — the preferred channel is the contact form rather than social media. Form submissions create a traceable record that makes it possible to investigate and correct sourcing errors properly.

How to reach this office

Primary contact method: The message submission form linked in the site header and footer.

Response windows vary by inquiry type:

1. General ranking questions (format comparisons, scoring adjustments, tier logic) — typically addressed within 2 business days.
2. Data correction requests (incorrect player information, outdated ADP figures, broken tools) — flagged for review within 1 business day and corrected or escalated within 3.
3. Partnership and syndication inquiries — reviewed on a weekly basis; expect a response within 5–7 business days.
4. Press and editorial requests — routed to the editorial team; response time depends on volume and deadline proximity.

There is no phone support. That is not an oversight — ranking disputes at 11 p.m. on a Sunday in August are better served by a written record than a voicemail.

Service area covered

Fantasy Rankings Authority operates with national scope across the United States, covering all major professional leagues tracked in fantasy competition: NFL, NBA, MLB, and NHL. The fantasy football rankings, fantasy baseball rankings, fantasy basketball rankings, and fantasy hockey rankings sections each reflect US-based league structures, scoring conventions, and platform norms.

Daily fantasy content under daily fantasy sports rankings reflects DFS contest structures as offered on US-accessible platforms, with no coverage of international league formats or non-US regulatory environments.

Format coverage includes:

• Season-long redraft leagues (redraft fantasy rankings)
• Dynasty formats (dynasty fantasy rankings)
• Best ball competitions (best ball rankings)
• Keeper leagues (keeper league rankings)
• Superflex configurations (superflex rankings)

Questions about formats not verified above — two-quarterback leagues with custom scoring, for instance — fall within the scope of the customizing fantasy rankings for your league resource, which addresses non-standard configurations in detail.

What to include in your message

A well-constructed inquiry saves a round of clarifying questions and gets to an answer faster. The 4 elements below cover the information that makes a response actionable.

1. The specific ranking format in question. "My rankings seem off" is a starting point; "PPR half-point, 12-team, snake draft, Week 9 rest-of-season" is a working question. Specifying the format — including whether it is redraft, keeper, or dynasty — narrows the scope immediately.

2. The player or position in dispute. Name the player, their position, and their current ranking or ADP as shown on the site. If the issue involves a positional tier (for example, why a particular tight end appears in Tier 2 rather than Tier 3), reference the tier-based drafting strategy framing and describe what the expected placement was.

3. The platform or tool producing the conflicting data. Rankings vs. ADP gaps are common and often intentional — a ranking reflects projected value, not market consensus. Knowing whether the comparison point is FantasyPros, ESPN, Yahoo, or a custom league platform helps explain the discrepancy rather than simply flagging it as an error.

4. The urgency level. Draft-day questions with a hard deadline get prioritized differently than off-season methodology inquiries. Stating a draft date or decision deadline in the message allows triage accordingly.

Messages that include all 4 elements tend to receive responses that are specific rather than generic — the difference between an answer that changes a decision and one that restates what the glossary already says.